The experience of confusion about what kind of screen is technologically higher? What is the best purchase, an LCD or plasma display? In this article we want to clarify the benefits of both a contribution to the clearer, simpler.
The most difficult part is that both have different technologies, but offers almost the same advantages, so that the choice ultimately depends on the pricing, properties and manufacturer mark. In terms of image quality, the two screens are very clear and sharp imaging, but to close the LCD screen (LCD LED) projects "Imaging black", which means that more darkness provides that color. Although this has been reduced and improved in recent years, LCD, plasma apparently not the problem, which is so bad that the LCD display.
Plasmas are generally better viewing from all sides, while the LCD screens have an effect May gradually from different angles of view, and ultimately the image May not be seen as the extreme side, top, bottom, etc.
The LCD screens seem an advantage over the plasma physics in terms of the reflectivity on the screen, as the screens made of plastic, mat, and they do not reflect too much light. Plasma with the glass screens, a blinding, if they reflect the light so that the amount of reflections on the screen depends on the introduction of television, in more or less illuminated.
Despite these advantages of each, the rest seems even with the long life is very good here, both may take over about 20 years ago by the quality of the image unchanged until the image begins to fade. The resolution, and the saturation of colors, and additional functions are also approximately the same. The size is one of the characteristics of individual competitive, because they offer a maximum of 65-inch screen in width and about 3 inches in depth.
The consumption of energy is an important element here is the plasmas are generally less energy efficient as the LCD screens. Plasma Physics pixilated technology to provide a clear picture of crystal, but be aware that each of these thousands of pixels with power must remain switched on when the additional work these fires more energy. The LCD screen has crossed the border since the operation depends above all on light rays through a prism specialized and consumes very little power. It is as the properties of the combustion of energy between a pear and a fluorescent-watt light bulb.
At the end of the line: The benefits of one kind or another seems to be a raffle, with the main differences in the use of technology that you are prompted to think that would be a high the other in terms of performance, but that is not the case. It seems not a question that is chosen, consumers are still many things.
The most difficult part is that both have different technologies, but offers almost the same advantages, so that the choice ultimately depends on the pricing, properties and manufacturer mark. In terms of image quality, the two screens are very clear and sharp imaging, but to close the LCD screen (LCD LED) projects "Imaging black", which means that more darkness provides that color. Although this has been reduced and improved in recent years, LCD, plasma apparently not the problem, which is so bad that the LCD display.
Plasmas are generally better viewing from all sides, while the LCD screens have an effect May gradually from different angles of view, and ultimately the image May not be seen as the extreme side, top, bottom, etc.
The LCD screens seem an advantage over the plasma physics in terms of the reflectivity on the screen, as the screens made of plastic, mat, and they do not reflect too much light. Plasma with the glass screens, a blinding, if they reflect the light so that the amount of reflections on the screen depends on the introduction of television, in more or less illuminated.
Despite these advantages of each, the rest seems even with the long life is very good here, both may take over about 20 years ago by the quality of the image unchanged until the image begins to fade. The resolution, and the saturation of colors, and additional functions are also approximately the same. The size is one of the characteristics of individual competitive, because they offer a maximum of 65-inch screen in width and about 3 inches in depth.
The consumption of energy is an important element here is the plasmas are generally less energy efficient as the LCD screens. Plasma Physics pixilated technology to provide a clear picture of crystal, but be aware that each of these thousands of pixels with power must remain switched on when the additional work these fires more energy. The LCD screen has crossed the border since the operation depends above all on light rays through a prism specialized and consumes very little power. It is as the properties of the combustion of energy between a pear and a fluorescent-watt light bulb.
At the end of the line: The benefits of one kind or another seems to be a raffle, with the main differences in the use of technology that you are prompted to think that would be a high the other in terms of performance, but that is not the case. It seems not a question that is chosen, consumers are still many things.
0 comments:
Post a Comment